Professional services operations

Anika operational AI workflow

Anika demonstrates operational AI work around email intake, classification, draft generation, business memory, knowledge/context retrieval, tool integration, approval gates, send/edit/reject feedback, corrections and follow-through without exposing private customer data.

01

Channels

WhatsAppEmailWebAPIsVoice-ready architecture
02

Identity and context

TenantUserWorkflowBusiness state
03

AgentBus / Coordinator

RoutingAgent selectionHand-offsEscalation
04

AI employees

PriyaAlexAnika
05

MemoryOS + Agentic RAG

FactsPoliciesCorrectionsKnowledge retrieval
06

Governed execution

RBACTool permissionsHITLDecision receipts
07

Reliability

RetriesFallbacksTimeoutsObservabilityEvaluation

Problem

Operational email workflows require context, classification, draft preparation, approval before action, and the ability to learn from corrections over time.

What was built

  • Email intake and classification workflow
  • Draft generation with business context and approval gates
  • Gmail/tool integration patterns
  • Send, edit and reject feedback loop
  • Business memory and correction-informed future behavior
  • Follow-through on unresolved operational work where supported by implementation evidence

Technologies

  • Python
  • Database-backed memory
  • Gmail integration patterns
  • Workflow approvals
  • Twilio/WhatsApp HITL where verified

Capabilities demonstrated

  • AI Employees
  • Operations automation
  • Email automation
  • HITL
  • Persistent Memory
  • Decision records

Memory and governance

Persistent context with approval and audit boundaries.

MarketIQX does not present unconstrained autonomy. The model is memory-backed, tool-aware, and governed by permissions, risk checks, and human approval where needed.

EventIdentity + ContextRecallFacts / Policies / HistoryAgent reasoningActionOutcome / CorrectionWrite-back
AI prepares action
Risk and confidence check
Low riskExecute within permission
Higher riskHuman approval: send, edit, or reject
Record outcome and correction

Related pages

Follow the proof into the architecture.

Build Something Like This